Enthusiast of the mysterious

Author: cskowronski (Page 2 of 3)

Early Horror Films

While doing background research on The Beetle, I discovered tons of sites that included information on early motion pictures. Many of them mentioned The Beetle, a British film from 1919. Curiously, not even stills from this classic are to be found anywhere, while other films from this era such as Nosferatu (1922), Frankenstein (1910), or Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde (1920) have stood the test of time and are regarded as some of the best silent films of all time. I wonder if the fact this movie was never as popular as the others is why we don’t hear so much about the novel? After all, it was more popular than Dracula when the two horror novels had been released. All of us grow up hearing about other early monsters (Frankestein, Dracula, Hyde) that had established their dominance on the silver screen well before our time but rarely do we hear about Richard Marsh’s creation. Would The Beetle novel be just as popular as these other monsters if the film was more popular?

I also kept on seeing results for The Golden Beetle (1907) which was one of the first ‘colorized’ films (each frame was hand painted in post-production). The Beetle brought up the ideals of the New Woman, so I loved how in this film a badass lady beetle captures a man and destroys him.

Can be watched here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzOrnIPxpuc

“How Oscar Wilde Painted Over Dorian Gray”

This article from The New Yorker goes into the implications the book had on Wilde’s life. Due to the homoerotic symbolism in the novel, Wilde was convicted of “committing acts of gross indecency with certain male persons” and thrown in prison. After his death Wilde was known as a homosexual martyr that even inspired a nascent gay-rights movement.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/08/08/deceptive-picture

QCQ #7- Dorian Gray (ch 1-11)

“Yes, that would serve to wrap the dreadful thing in. It had perhaps served often as a pall for the dead. Now it was to hide something that had a corruption of its own, worse than the corruption of death itself- something that would breed horrors and yet would never die.”

wilde, pg 153

After Dorian discovers the painting is taking on the burdens of his sins and not his own body, he decides to hide the paining away out of fear and repulsion. Placing a pall, or casket cover, over the painting is an act that symbolizes the death of a part of Dorian- the part that ages and bears the effects of sin and self punishment. Without these, Dorian does not appear to age, however his soul will always show the marks of his dark behaviors. Despite his appearance of beauty and purity, Dorian is quite turmoiled over the painting and its changing appearance. The painting represents Dorians soul, in a sense he will always be knowing of, and burdened by his poor behaviors even if other people are not able to see them.

Q: Is the painting a way of punishing Dorian for his suspected dark behaviors? Without the painting, he would not likely think about the effects of these behaviors on himself. Looking at the aging, scouring picture, Dorian is reminded of the guilt that should be following him.

QCQ #6 Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

“But tonight there was a shudder in his blood; the face of Hyde sat heavy on his memory; he felt (what was rare with him) a nausea and dictate of life…”

stevenson, 44

Mr. Utterson is recalling seeing the face of Hyde, a small, devilish looking man. No one is quite able to describe why they find Hyde’s face so disturbing, yet they are all deeply affected by his appearance. Hydes brutal acts of violence are not necessary to see in order to understand he is a psychopath, however I wonder if anyone would be able to see through Hyde and see his true character underneath if they had tried to understand him. If time had gone on, perhaps Mr. Utterson would have been able to piece together the information needed to know Jekyll and Hyde were actually the same person. Jekyll himself seems unsure if they are the same people- referring to himself in both the first and third person- so it could be possible that there really is a true separation between the two consciousnesses.

Question: Is just looking at Hydes appearance enough to sense the evil he is made up of? Would anyone be able to find Jekyll within Hyde if they had tried hard enough- is there any park of Jekyll in Hyde?

“The Anxiety of the Unforseen in Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde”

“If it is true that evil is inherent in all people or at least the result of people’s experience rather than divine providence, then it becomes more difficult to say with certainty that God had any role in forming the hearts and minds of human beings.”

Fuller, b. 2016

This analysis of the novel provides interesting thoughts on how Victorians may have viewed this novel based on the new research and understanding of psychology coming to light.

http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1491/the-anxiety-of-the-unforseen-in-stevensons-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde

Discovering Primary Sources

The Wellcome’s Mental Health digitized records include a large span of primary source material that deal with the history of medicine dating from the 15th century to present day. Topics covered include anatomy, chemistry, psychology, zoology, and almost everything in between. The artifact I chose to explore is ‘Reasons for the establishing and further encouragement of Saint Luke’s Hospital for Lunaticks’ published 1830 in London, England. It is a small, printed book which includes lists of current staff, instructions, properties, and annual accounts and statistics. St. Lukes was founded in 1750 and functioned as a mental hospital for the poor. I chose this artifact because I am intrigued by the aspect of inhumane treatment of the mentally ill during this time period. Terms once widely used by professionals for describing the mentally ill (lunatic or idiot) would be considered wildly inappropriate today. When looking at the patient summaries, less than half of all patients that had been admitted were discharged as cured. The majority were discharged as uncured, idiots, diseased, or unfit. What would they do with these patients that were released as uncured? The concept of being deemed as an idiot or unfit for treatment also makes me wonder what criteria was being used for admission. When we think about Rochester keeping Bertha, a mentally unstable woman, in his attic for all those years, we are quick to judge Rochester for locking her up, questioning if he was the cause of her insanity. However thinking back to the level of understanding people had of mental health during this time period, many people would not have been able to understand Bertha’s mental illness or its cause. This article reminded me to think of things in the context of the time period they were written in and not just mine. Getting a closer look at primary sources from the time period made it easier for this to be accomplished and see another point of view.

QCQ 5: Jane Eyre ch 32- end

“It seemed I had found a brother; one I could be proud of, – one I could love; and two sisters, whose qualities were such, that when I knew them but as mere strangers, they had inspired me with genuine affection and admiration.”

Brtonë, 482-483

Comment:Jane has recently discovered she has inherited 20,000 pounds from her Uncle John Eyre who had passed away. This inheritance provides her with both wealth and family which overjoys her immensely. Her entire life she has felt as though she did not belong and would be wanted or accepted by anyone else besides Rochester. Now it seems Jane has found all she had hoped for. The children she teaches at school become her friends and she has a family with St. John and cousins Diana and Mary; even deciding to split her fortune with them evenly. This gesture shows Janes value of money. She is more grateful to have found her family than to have been given a large inheritance. Later in the novel, St. John deeply pressures Jane to marry him, but Jane is able to demonstrate she will not give in to these pressures in order to stand up for her beliefs about marriage. After her previous time Rochester, she has seen the importance of following her heart and not giving into persuasive men. Without the fear of ever being alone, she returns to Rochester who is now free of his previous wife Bertha, and able to officially marry her.

Question: Jane Eyre’s life was greatly influenced by the news of her uncles passing and inheritance- how would her relationships with her family be if they had never discovered to be related? Would Jane still have denied St. John and gone back to Rochester?

I care for myself.

“Think of his misery; think of his danger—look at his state when left alone; remember his headlong nature; consider the recklessness following on despair—soothe him; save him; love him; tell him you love him and will be his. Who in the world cares for you?

Brontë, pg 408
« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 Calista's Site

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

css.php